MAP
PROJECTIONS
What is meant by Map Projection? A map projection is a system in which locations on the
curved surface of the earth are displayed on a flat sheet or surface according
to some set of rules.
The Map Projection Process:
(a) The earth’s real shape (Geoid)
is thought to represent an ellipsoid through the adoption of the magnitudes of
the major and minor semi-axes that best fits the real shape. The datum line is
then determined.
(b)For practical measurement purposes, a shere having the same surface area as the ellipsoid is
chosen as a standard and its radius calculated
(c) The sphere is then reduced to a reference Globe from
which all map projections are projected.
(d)The spherical surface of the earth is then transformed
mathematically on to a flat surface
Distorted Properties of the Earth's
Surface
1. Angles, (Directions) 2.
Relative distances,
3. Areas, and
4. Shapes, become distorted a
portion of the earth’s is transformed from the curved surface to a plane.
Relevance of Map Projections to Map
making
A
projection provides the locational framework for all thematic maps. Maps are a
common source of input data for a GIS and often input maps will be in different
projections, requiring transformation of one or all maps to make coordinates
compatible. We often need to know distances between places, Areas of countries,
states, and parcels of land, Directions of Electronic signals, winds and
headings for navigation.
FIGURES OF THE EARTH
A
figure of the earth is a geometrical model used to generate projections; a
compromise between the desire for mathematical simplicity and the need for
accurate approximation of the earth's shape types in common use. Common figures
that have been used to represent the earth include: a) Plane, b) Sphere c) Illipsoid
Plane Assumes the earth is flat (use no projection) used for maps only
intended to depict general relationships or for maps of small areas at scales
larger than 1:10,000. Planar representation has little effect on accuracy.
Planar projections are usually assumed when working with air photos
Sphere Assumes the earth is perfectly spherical. Does not
truly represent the earth's shape
Spheroid or ellipsoid of rotation This is the figure created by rotating an ellipse
about its minor axis. The spheroid models the fact that the earth's diameter at
the equator is greater than the distance between poles, by about 0.3% at global
scales, the difference between the sphere and spheroid are small, about equal to the
topographic variation on the earth's surface with a line width of 0.5 mm the
earth would have to be drawn with a radius of
15 cm before the
two models would deviate the difference is unlikely to affect mapping of
the globe at scales smaller than 1:10,000,000. The spheroid is still an
approximation to the actual shape of the earth. The earth is actually slightly
pear shaped, slightly larger in the southern hemisphere, and has other smaller
bulges therefore, different spheroids are used in different regions, each
chosen to fit the observed datum of each region accurate
conversion between latitude and longitude and projected coordinates requires knowledge of the
specific figures of the earth that have been used. The actual shape of the
earth can now be determined quite accurately by observing satellite orbits. Satellite
systems, such as GPS, can determine latitude and longitude at any point on the
earth's surface to accuracies of fractions of a second. Thus, it is now
possible to observe otherwise invisible errors introduced by the use of an
approximate figure for map projections
The
Projection Challenge: The Earth is a spheroid, and the best way to
represent it is with a globe. This scale model retains all of the desired
properties necessary to produce the perfect map: area, distance, direction, and
shape are all accurately represented. However, when this spheroid is projected
on to a flat map, all these properties cannot be retained simultaneously. In
fact, each projection is a compromise, showing some properties accurately,
while at the same time, allowing others to be distorted. The extent
to which these properties are preserved, provides another method of classifying
projections.
Despite
the problems related to distortion, all projections do retain one important
feature, that of positional accuracy. By transforming the graticule
(a gridded reference network of latitude and
longitude lines, encompassing the globe) to a map, the spatial relationship
between points on both surfaces is maintained.
DEVELOPABLE SURFACES
The
most common methods of projection can be conceptually described by imagining the developable surface, which is a
surface that can be made
flat by cutting it
along certain lines and unfolding or unrolling it. The points or lines
where a developable surface touches the globe
in projecting from
the globe are called standard parallels, or points and
lines of zero distortion. At these points and lines, the scale is constant
and equal to that of the globe, no linear distortion is present if
the developable surface touches the globe, the projection is called tangent if
the surface cuts into the globe, it is called secant where the surface and the
globe intersect, there is no distortion where the surface is outside the globe,
objects appear bigger than in reality - scales are greater than 1 where the
surface is inside the globe, objects appear smaller than in
reality and scales are less than 1
Commonly used developable surfaces are:
1.
Plane or Azimuthal: A flat sheet is placed in contact with a globe, and
points are projected from the globe to the sheet mathematically, the projection
is easily expressed as mappings from latitude and longitude to polar
coordinates with the origin located at the point of contact with the paper. Produces planar projections.
2.
Cone: The transformation is
made to the surface of a cone tangent at a small circle (tangent case) or
intersecting at two small circles (secant case) on a globe mathematically, This projection is also expressed as mappings from latitude
and longitude to polar coordinates, but with the origin located at the apex of
the cone. Produces Conical projections.
3.
Cylinder: Developed by
transforming the spherical surface to a tangent or secant cylinder.
Mathematically, a cylinder wrapped around the equator is expressed with x equal
to longitude, and the y coordinates some function of latitude. Produces Cylindrical projections.
Scale Factor and Transformations
In
projections, the scale of the reference Globe is called the Principal Scale (PS). To derive the
principal Scale we divide the earth's radius by the radius of the globe. On the
reference globe therefore, the actual scale anywhere will be equal to the
principal scale. The Scale Factor (SF) is the actual scale divided by the
Principal Scale. The scale factor will therefore be 1.0 everywhere on the
globe.
When
part of the globe's surface is transformed onto a flat map, the actual scale at
various places on the flat map will vary, the scale
will be larger or smaller than the principal scale. This is because the Plane
and the Globe are not of the same shape so that one cannot be transformed to
the other without stretching, shrinking
or tearing. Consequently, it is impossible to devise a transformation from
a reference globe to a plane without distortion of some kind except at Standard
Parallels or Standard lines. However by skillfully varying the scale factor, we
can achieve the following:
a) retain some angular relationships or,
b) retain relative sizes of of
figures.
Transformations:
When
angular relations on a map are retained, the projection is called Conformal or Orthomorphic "correct shape". It is also possible on a map to retain
representation of areas so that all regions will be shown in correct relative
size. Such a projection is said to be Equal Area. When a uniform scale is
retained in most parts of a map distance properties are maintained. Equidistant
Projections maintain scale in all directions from one or two points. Scale
properties are also maintained along standard parallels. Projections which
maintain directions (azimuths) in all directions from one or two points and
show Great circle arcs with correct azimuths are called Azimuthal
projections.
COMMONLY USED MAP PROJECTIONS
1.
Conformal (Orthomorphic)
A
projection is conformal if the angles in the original features are preserved.
Over small areas the shapes of objects will be preserved. However, thr preservation of shape does not hold with large regions (i.e.
Meridians
cross each other at right angles and meridians intersect parallels at right
angles
Scale
is the same in all directions about a point
Generally,
areas near margins have a larger scale than areas near the center.
Maps
with conformal projections are used for analyzing, guiding or recording motion
or angular relationships. For example navigation, Topographic Maps,
Meteorological charts
Good
for mapping phenomena with circular radiational
patterns such as hurricanes, wind directions, radiowave
broadcasts, seismic wave patterns etc
There
are four conformal projections in common use. These are:
a) The Mercator,
b) Transverse Mercator,
c) Lambert's Conformal Conic with two standard Parrallels and
d) Stereographic Azimuthal.
2.
Equal area Projections
The
representation of areas is preserved so that all regions on the projection will
be represented in correct relative size. Equal area maps cannot be conformal,
so most earth angles are deformed, shapes are strongly
distorted as well as distances. The intersection of Meridians and parallels are
not at right angles. This is an excellent projection for studying distributions
on maps of the
Commonly
used Equal Area Projections include:
a)
b) Lambert's Equal Area
c) Cylindrical Equal area with two standard parallels
3.
Azimuthal Projections
Azimuthal
projections show true directions from one central point to other points.
Directions from points other than the central point to other points are not
accurate. Azimuthal
projections may be centered anywhere with respect to the reference globe. A
line perpendicular to the plane of projection will necessarily pass through the
center of the globe. Consequently, all distortions are symmetrical around the
chosen center.
Commonly
used azimuthal projections include:
a) Stereographic projection
b) Gnomic projection
c) Lambert's azimuthal
equal-area projection
d) Orthographic projection
4.
Equidistant Projections
Equidistant
projections maintain relative distances from one or two points only. The
distance property does not apply everywhere. Great circle distances are
preserved so that in a conic projection all distances from the center are
represented at the same scale. Scale is uniform along the lines whose distances
are true An example of an equidistant projection is
the Conic Equidistant projection and Equidistant cylindrical which takes the
equator as a standard parallel. Widely
used for navigational charts.
5.
Other Map Projections
a)
Robinsons Projections:
It
is a projection that minimizes the appearance of angular and area distortions.
It is neither conformal or equal-area but a compromise
between the two. It is the projection used for Rand McNally and Company's World
Maps, Roads etc.
b)
Non-geometric projections
Molleweide
Developed
in 1805, Molleweides projection has become widely
used for mapping world distributions. The equator is a standard line. Parallels are straight lines parallel to the
equator Meridians are curved and the one’s at right angles from the central
meridian form a complete circle Maximun shape
distortion occurs at the corners where the intersections of the meridians and
parallels are most oblique
Used
mainly for the mapping of World’s thematic distributions
CHOOSING MAP PROJECTIONS
a) Type of feature to be mapped (area based eg forests or line based)
b) Relative size of interested region
c) The shape of the interested area (east-west extension
or north-south extension)
d) Projections property (conformality,
equivalence, azimuthal etc)
e) Attributes of the Projection (parallel parallels,
local area distortion, rectangular coordinates)
f) Amount and arrangement of distortion eg Atlases or topographic series one may choose a
projection that shows the same pattern of distortion over large areas as for
small areas.
g) Projection center: can the projection be centered
easily for the design problem
A GUIDE FOR SELECTING PROJECTIONS
a) Continents
Bonne, Lambert Azimuthal,
b) Countries in Low Latitudes
Equal area, Molleweide,
Hammer, Sinusoidal, Cylindrical
c) Large and Small Countries at Mid-Latitudes
Conical Projections, Lambert’s Azimuthal Equal Area,
SUMMARY OF MAP PROJECTIONS
|
Projection |
Type |
Properties |
Regional
Use |
General
Use |
|
Mercator |
Cylindrical |
conformal |
World*,
equatorial, east-west extent, large and medium scale |
navigation |
|
Transverse Mercator |
Cylindrical |
Conformal |
continents/oceans,
equatorial/mid-latitude, north-south extent, large and medium scale |
topographic
|
|
Lambert
conformal conic |
Conic |
conformal |
continents/oceans,
equatorial/mid-latitude, east-west extent, large and medium scale |
mapping
countries of |
|
Azimuthal equidistant |
Planar |
equidistant* |
World*, hemisphere, equatorial/mid-latitude, continents/oceans,
regions/seas, polar, large scale* |
navigation, topographic |
|
Lambert azimuthal equal-area |
Planar |
equal area |
hemisphere,
continents/oceans, equatorial/mid-latitude, polar |
navigation,
thematic, Geomatics Canada North America reference
map, U.S.G.S. maps |
|
Polyconic |
Conic |
equidistant* |
region/seas,
north-south extent, medium and large scale |
topographic |
|
Stereographic |
Planar |
conformal |
hemisphere,
polar, continents/oceans, regions/seas, equatorial/mid-latitude medium and
large scale |
navigation, topographic
|
|
van der Grinten I |
Individual or
unique |
Compromise |
World,
equatorial, east-west extent |
Geomatics
Canada World Map, U.S.G.S. maps |
|
Robinson |
Pseudo-cylindrical |
Compromise |
World |
thematic,
reference maps |
|
Miller cylindrical |
Cylindrical |
Compromise |
World |
thematic,
reference maps |
|
Eckert IV |
Pseudo-cylindrical |
Equal area |
World |
thematic,
reference maps |
|
Sinusoidal |
Pseudo-cylindrical |
Equal area |
World,
continents/oceans equatorial, north-south extent |
thematic,
reference maps |
|
|
|
* Limitations
apply |
|
** |
REVIEW QUESTIONS
1. Define the term, map
projection, and give a brief description of the process.
2. What are developable shapes? Name three. Name one shape that is not
developable and explain why.
3. Explain the following terms: spheroid, tangency, secancy, standard parallel and central meridian.
4. Briefly describe the polyconic projection.
5. Define the terms, great circle and rhumb line and
explain their importance to navigation.
Name two projections used in the construction of maps used for
navigation.
6. Name the most renowned projection and describe its type, properties and use.
7. With regard to map projection, explain the significance of map scale.
8. When is a map projection equal-area, equidistant, azimuthal
or conformal? Give examples of projections, each having at least one of these
properties.
9. What are the common properties of all azimuthal
(zenithal), projections?
10. Explain the term "interrupted" projection. What advantages does
it have over other types of World projections?
11. Describe the problem of "edge matching" in regard to cartographic
production and map reading.
12. Briefly describe some of the important factors involved in choosing the
best map projection.
13. Select a common projection not already mentioned in this unit, and describe
it in terms of the above table.
REFERENCES
Dana, Peter H. 1995. Map Projections. URL The Geographer's
Craft Project. Dept. of Geography,
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research
Institute, Inc.).
1994. Map Projections, Georeferencing spatial data.
Gersmehl, Philip J. 1991. The
Language of Maps. Pathways in Geography Series, title no. 1.
Greenhood, David. 1964. Mapping.
Pearson II,
Raisz, Erwin. 1962. Principles of Cartography.
Robinson, Arthur H., and
Snyder, John P., and Voxland,
Philip M. 1989. An
Maling,
D.H., 1973. Coordinate Systems and Map Projections,
George Phillip and Son Limited,
Robinson,
A.H., R.D.
Snyder,
J.P., 1987. Map Projections - A Working
Strahler,
A.N. and
A.H. Strahler, 1987. Modern Physical Geography, 3rd edition, Wiley,